
InsideWestford
InsideLowell
InsideLowell
Special Guest Contributor
InsideLowell
InsideLowell
InsideLowell
InsideLowell
Enjoy the latest from InsideMedia
Search Inside Lowell for past episodes on
any Popular Podcast Player
Leave a question for comment and we'll do our best to answer them
or text your question to 978-5-INSIDE
The latest updates from InsideMedia direct to you
Add me to the InsideMedia Email List

“We had a fantastic turnout at the concert and I know it was because of InsideLowell.”
(Fairly Unusual Narratives)
100 Merrimack St, Suite 410, Lowell MA 01852
© 2026 InsideMedia Corporation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
“Markley Group makes record requests”: https://www.lowellsun.com/2026/08/12/markley-group-makes-record- requests/ Once again, this is what happens when justified grassroots citizen advocacy collides with high-stakes corporate development. But, there are legal frameworks in place that protect BOTH public participation and municipal government. For private citizens, organizing and advocating legitimate concerns regarding ANY and ALL industrial expansions, there is the Massachusetts “anti-SLAPP” statute (MGL c. 231, section 59H). This serves as an absolute protective shield that gives legitimate petitioning and advocacy activities such as emailing local officials, calling, texting or filing environmental lawsuits “immune from retaliatory civil liability and shifting all defense costs to the corporation if a meritless intimidation lawsuit is filed”. Furthermore, while ANY and ALL corporate tactics may include sweeping public records requests targeting municipal communications to uncover resident and citizens strategy, and while those communications are public record, the “anti-SLAPP” framework ensures that simply engaging with local leaders remains a legally Protected right. Simultaneously, while public officials face conditional personal protection depending on whether they are sued in an official capacity (where they are fully indemnified by the municipality under MGL c. 258, section 9) or an individual capacity, the city itself must defend its legislative/zoning actions in a different arena. Surviving aggressive and intimidating corporate lawsuits challenging newly enacted ordinances, Lowell can’t just rely on “anti-SLAPP” motions, instead, the local Board of Health must construct an unassailable record by “grounding its regulations in objective, documented public health data”, like independent sound studies, safety, health issues and ensuring uniform enforcement across ALL local commercial/business infrastructures. This will provide and prove that Lowell is executing a valid, industry-neutral policy of general applicability to safeguard the city, city wide.
- Jeanne Balkas