Inside Stories

A Black Eye on Dracut

by Phil Thibault
Special Contribution to InsideDracut

There are milestones and benchmarks that people inevitably use to measure the growth, stagnation and decline of a community. While most would strive to foster growth by raising standards, three members of the Dracut Board of Selectman have taken the approach to removal standards for themselves and thus be held unaccountable for stagnation and decline. I had to check my calendar after the December 13th Board of Selectmen meeting, I thought it was 1984! Truth is a lie, integrity is malfeasance, and accountability is subrogation.

I suspect if the Board of Selectmen had a Code of Conduct, the meeting would have been more professional. Both Heather Santiago-Hutchings and Tony Archinski have included a Code of Conduct in their goals for the Board of Selectmen. Tony just recently proposed language for the document. The other three: DiRocco, Kopcinski, and Genest would have no part of a code. The trio’s legal mind even concluded that “it would be just another piece of paper.” Imagine if their efforts were used to promote Dracut rather than themselves.

One of the most important goals highlighted by the Dracut Master Plan is the review and rewrite of the Zoning Bylaws. The last full review was conducted in 1985. The Master Plan Committee concluded the old bylaws no longer reflect the growth potential and desires of the community. In a practical sense the bylaws are antiquated and are hindering Dracut’s progress. So, a Zoning Bylaw Review Committee was formed as an ad-hoc committee comprised of only members of existing boards. I was critical that no members of the public, “members at large,” were included in the role of the committee. Selectmen Chair Genest was in opposition to the idea of at large members, claiming they would only slow down the process. I guess we can’t have the masses interfering with her government.

Selectperson Heather Santiago-Hutchings had finally secured appointments for at large members to the displeasure of Triade. I had applied for one of the appointments to the Zoning Bylaw Review Committee. I had an interview with the ZBRC to discuss my experience of planning and zoning: 14 years on the Planning Board, 3 years on the Master Plan Committee, 21 years with Northern Middlesex Council of Governments, 16 years on the Permanent Building Committee, 6 years on Capitol Planning, and 3 years on Community Preservation Committee. I appreciated the time the ZBRC granted to me and was humble to hear them say that my experience dwarfed the experience of the entire committee. The ZRBC voted unanimously to recommend my appointment to the Board of Selectmen.

Bringing us back to the December 13th meeting, sans Code of Conduct. Kopcinski, a self-proclaimed political newcomer, suddenly remembered a 15-minute radio broadcast from 6 years prior, 2016, where I spoke of my resignation from the Planning Board. She alluded the resignation was because of a conflict of interest and further insinuated that the resignation was required by the State Ethics Commission. I had spoken with the Ethics Commission regarding a potential project that would need to be presented to the Dracut Planning Board. The determination from the Ethics Commission was that I would need to recuse myself from the proceedings. Several months prior to the project being presented, I chose to leave the Planning Board as a surety of removing controversy in a determination by the Planning Board. A conflict therefore never existed with my profession as an architect and service to the Town. But where there is no honor on the Board of Selectmen, good intensions are reasons enough to disparage volunteers. The three: DiRocco, Kopcinski, and Genest proceeded to create hypothetical situations and phantom conflicts to justify their denial, all based on a twisted false accusation. Further ironic since Chair Genest has been embroiled in unethical conduct and the Ethics Commission for seating herself as Chair for the Beaver Brook Farm Committee, a property she is an abutter to or appointing her husband to the Dracut Access Television board of directors, an organization the Town of Dracut has a contract with as a cable access provider. In her defense, “these items were not on the agenda, and we can’t talk about them due to open meeting laws.”

The coup-de-gras of course is Genest questioning my lack of decorum and professional behavior. She points to my social media post. I have posted announcements about events in Dracut, along with sharing information from other sources: The Lowell Sun, WCAP, and InsideLowell. These are often done without much editorial comment. Otherwise, Star Wars memes, Edward Hopper paintings, and inspirational quotes litter my pages. Not everybody’s preference I’m sure, but not without its charm. Perhaps her preference of editorials is more akin to her husband’s political slasher pieces in the Valley Patriot’s Eye on Dracut. Now that’s a low bar to crawl under.

(Editorial Comment: Phil Thibault Architect, LLC is a sponsor of InsideMedia Corportation)

5 responses to “A Black Eye on Dracut”

  1. Tim M says:

    Sirocco has been part of the dark side of Dracut politics for years. Has partnered with Shaw on many occasions to derail project upon project. It wasn’t until DiRocco circumvented the town manager search as set in the town by laws did Shaw finally separate himself. DiRocco has had foothold on the likes of Sheehan, Forcier and Hughes for several years until Forcier recently ran off and hid in Methuen. Genest was supported by DiRocco as was Kopcinski in order to get the votes to become selectmen and get Genest’s husband a spot on the DATV board.
    Kopcinski just follows along with those two do.

    Phil on the other hand has done more for the town this any of those listed above ever have or will.

  2. Brian Bond says:

    Phil Thibault has works private sector as an architect, has been involved on many boards in Dracut. Since his involvement in these boards his business has grown quite a bit. I was very friendly with Phil for many years. While seating on the Dracut Access TV Board with him and more specificity during the construction of the new studio I discovered what kind of a person he really was.
    • Phil was paid from the buildout by charging for architectural drawing while I oversaw the construction at no pay. Mind you, we were both supposed to be volunteers!
    • Phil allowed poor installation and workmanship to remain without having the contractors fix them. As the rep. of DATV I would bring this issue to the attention of Phil and other members. As the paid architect Phil would argue for the contractors. He seemed to be more concerned with getting future work with them then protecting DATV.
    • Phil recommended hiring an engineer to design the HVAC & electrical at a cost of $20,000. I recommended having those items designed built by Phil, the HVAC & electrical contractors and myself at no cost. Phil persuaded the board to hire his friend. Short story, his engineer friend who we paid messed up the design and DATV had to pay an additional $20,000 to fix the HVAC and an additional $15,000 to properly light areas.
    • Phil as treasure refused to transfer payroll for employees during Covid and I as president had to so the guys could be paid.
    • Most folks will never see this part of Phil but during a meeting Phil went into a fit of anger attacking Jack Lyons because Jack disagreed with him. It was jaw dropping.
    • Phil then bring false accusations, changes many by-laws without members input at the annual meeting, refuse to provide any proof to back up his claim to get suspend me from the DATV Board of Directors.
    Phil made the following changes DATV’s bylaws without the members approval in the darkest of nights. (Members must vote on bylaw changes)
    • By-law stated family members of comcast cannot be Board Members. To appoint a friend and change a vote of the board this by-law was remove.
    • A non-disclosure agreement was added to the by-laws. This stopped other board members from not only disclosing wrongdoing but basic happenings at DATV. As noted above Phil was involved in some very deceitful behavior.
    Phil’s personal vendettas will always take precedent over the best interest of Dracut. Post by Brian Bond

  3. Michael Najjar says:

    I guess Phil, no good deed goes unpunished. Nor does loyalty to friends, to your own detriment for too many years.

  4. Justin George says:

    Brian,

    Can you itemize and list all the things you’ve accused Dirocco has done that you complained or drew attention to over the past decade before you suddenly became friends please? Thanks

  5. […] guest column, “A Black Eye on Dracut,” is factually incorrect and injurious to my reputation. The published piece contains false […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *